Is Paul Arendt secretly Laurel Canyon’s time-displaced messenger, or has he simply found a wormhole between Andalusian streets and the corner of a smoky, unhurried blues bar? “Theo”, the enigmatic single from his unfolding concept album “Forty Years in Babylon”, certainly leaves you wondering. Or maybe, just reflecting. Maybe you’re both the listener and the prism through which contradictions refract, casting erratic beams of doubt and clarity onto your kitchen walls at 2 a.m.
In this modern tavern of tangled beliefs and shaking heads, “Theo” pits an unnamed speaker—our guide through the forest of faith—against a forlorn, skeptical voice that considers miracles to be nothing but tricks of dopamine or, worse yet, lazy neural circuitry. The song dances between faith and filaments of doubt as if it’s tango night at Hemingway’s forgotten bar. Arendt’s Spanish guitar, that perfectly picked-out spine of the song, floats above the debate like an old friend who refuses to take sides.
It feels like a conversation taking place below the surface of reality, that moment where intuition meets the cold brick wall of science, and both squint at each other awkwardly—and respectfully. Arendt manages to pull this conversation not from tired philosophical tomes but from lived experience: You can almost taste the humid air of some lost garden, or hear the shuffling feet in a classroom where our beliefs refuse to stay seated.
Arendt, armed only with his guitars and poetic lyrics, doesn’t aim to resolve these cosmic debates, but to host them. His gentle fingerpicking—sophisticated yet strikingly grounded in an ancient sense of rhythm—acts as the vessel for an emotional conversation that veers dangerously close to a Socratic dialogue at times, minus the academic pretension.
In that sense, “Theo” might actually be a postmodern campfire song. You’re huddled close, watching flames hold their shape for only a moment before splintering. Just like the debate itself, the simple and raw backbone of the song resists being pinned down. It’s hard not to recall Federico García Lorca’s duende—the ethereal mystery behind music and art that can’t be explained, only felt. But then, somewhere between the verses, Arendt’s rational atheist friend is likely sneering at Lorca, attributing him no more than a poet’s wild chemistry.
Can one speak of spirituality without sounding preachy? Can we defend science without seeming closed off? These questions bubble up as the song weaves its story. You wonder if the characters in “Theo” are just two sides of you, or perhaps two strangers pressing elevator buttons to different floors, neither in control of where the building is going. Maybe the point isn’t to choose one side after all but to acknowledge the beauty in both approaches—the elegance of cold calculation in one hand, mystical flickers in the other.
A notable heartbeat of the song is that it doesn’t resort to shouting its stakes. Arendt’s voice is tender here, like a hesitant storyteller who isn’t out to convert you one way or another. We get the sunset playing on the speaker’s faith, the atheist uncovering their layers of human conditioning with scientific care, and even fleeting glances towards synchronistic moments—as if the random stumbles of existence might mean something, even if we never understand what.
In this, Arendt channels something primal, yet unnervingly modern—both an echo from centuries-old pilgrimages and a whispered criticism from 21st-century laboratories. Somewhere in the cavernous spaces between his notes, you half expect Schrödinger’s cat to saunter out, wearing a crucifix and a calculator, purring ambiguities.
Music this tangled deserves space to breathe, and “Theo” gives you exactly that. It’s not trying to drown you in the noise, but instead, it invites you to crack open the windows of your mental house. Let the warm breeze of open-ended dialogue roll in. Imagine that.
It’s fitting that the song doesn’t answer the key question: is the universe stitched together by threads of intention or just bouncing atoms in chaotic ballet? The beauty of “Theo” lies in its unwillingness to simplify; rather, it lets the contradictions rest beautifully unresolved, like the sweetest poetry or a physics problem with too many variables.
And as the final chord rings out into a kind of shimmering horizon, you’re left pondering: What’s heavier? The rational mind or the soul’s shapeless desire for meaning? Maybe it’s neither. Maybe the weight is in the windows we open, not the questions we close.
Follow Paul Arendt on Bandcamp, Facebook and Instagram.
